Go Back   Travian.us:: Forum > Embassies of Travian - World 3 > Politics & diplomacy - World 3

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-25-2009, 05:55 AM   #1
Wren
Information Coordinator
 
Wren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: So Chi you thought I was bashful
Posts: 6,537
Wren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Wren Send a message via Skype™ to Wren
Default Wren's Alliance Analysis, 5/25/09

Well, after looking at the numbers, we had almost no changes over the two weeks since my last look. I wish I had something more interesting to report, but there really has been no change.

The only news of note, as far as I can tell, is that MTW are a bunch of cheaters. The MH exercised his banhammer and he banned upwards of 15 accounts for multi-accounting, with more, less extreme, punishments handed out to others. Shameful.

Oh, i almost forgot. TUS switched to NAPs? How pitiful.


By the numbers


Alliances by total population
1. TUS (2334670)
2. UIA (1955815)
3. MTW (1533979)
4. Nemesis (1138950)
5. Co. (1018302)
6. Scourge (838611)
7. MosTLy (519487)
8. DOL (462893)
9. MGD (431430)
10. NATION (422983)


Alliances by average population
1. Nemesis (11505)
2. MGD (10786)
3. DOL (10287)
4. UIA (9682)
5. Co. (9607)
6. CatOps (9539)
7. Scourge (9530)
8. TUS (7011)
9. JustUs (6452)
10. TNT (5964)


Alliances by average attack
1. MGD (52092)
2. Nemesis (36631)
3. DOL (31928)
4. UIA (26352)
5. Co. (25881)
6. Scourge (19269)
7. JustUs (18881)
8. TNT (17052)
9. TUS (15486)
10. CatOps (13597)


Alliances by total defense
1. TUS (2775331)
2. MTW (1878973)
3. UIA (1799161)
4. Co. (1605791)
5. NATION (911027)
6. Nemesis (744059)
7. DOL (707924)
8. MGD (574475)
9. Scourge (521441)
10. MosTLy (486585)

After two weeks of almost no change, here are the slightly updated server rankings.

Server's Strongest Alliances:
1. Nemesis
2. MGD
3. UIA
4. Co.
5. DOL
6. TUS
7. MTW
8. MosTLy
9. Scourge
10. JustUs


The comments are usually the most interesting/revealing part of these alliances, so speak your piece!
__________________

s3r2: Deakon - Nemesis/WFTW (winnarz!!) ...... s6r2: Anon - CD (lulz, failtrain)...... s1r4: 7RU

You has moar questions? Ask me directly!

Last edited by Wren; 05-25-2009 at 06:24 AM..
Wren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:12 AM   #2
Ravenica
Monsieur, your piece du resistance is ready.
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Unicorn Farm
Posts: 267
Ravenica is a name known to allRavenica is a name known to allRavenica is a name known to allRavenica is a name known to all
Default

- is still dominating, however we have a large farm population, the downside of not being able to boot anyone out, if only we could force them into some other alliance
__________________
NSFW
Ravenica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:20 AM   #3
Thy
Selling silks, spices, and spam!
 
Thy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: My laptop....
Posts: 367
Thy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to Thy
Default

Unbelievable, Easy and Fox Co were at war with each other and we still didn't boost up our attack and defense rankings . Well back to killing more Easy Co newbs....

And no, don't go fix this to blue, I'm dead serious
__________________
Register for the new servers here

Wren's FAQ l Anti-farm Guide l Teuton Guide l Roman Guide l Gaul Guide l T's troop analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSZephyr View Post
Rep is like a medal, something to show off. It has no real significance but it's still nice to have.
Thy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:37 AM   #4
SmackyBear
Pondering the perplexities of parentheses.
 
SmackyBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 698
SmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wren View Post
Oh, i almost forgot. TUS switched to NAPs? How pitiful.
Why does that matter exactly? If people want to take advantage of the stupid rules changes regarding conquerings, they're allowed to.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted in The Big "Bad Idea" Thread
25. Limiting the number of attacks someone can make: Players will not be limited in the number of attacks they can send out per day, or the number of attacks they can send at a specific player in a given time period. This is a full-PVP war game; large numbers of fairly indiscriminant attacks are encouraged. If this bothers you, then there are plenty of similar games with more restrictions on attacking.
It was a bad idea then and it's a bad idea now.

"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge."
-Bertrand Russell
SmackyBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:46 AM   #5
Wren
Information Coordinator
 
Wren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: So Chi you thought I was bashful
Posts: 6,537
Wren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Wren Send a message via Skype™ to Wren
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmackyBear View Post
Why does that matter exactly? If people want to take advantage of the stupid rules changes regarding conquerings, they're allowed to.
and why, exactly, should allies be conquering each other?
__________________

s3r2: Deakon - Nemesis/WFTW (winnarz!!) ...... s6r2: Anon - CD (lulz, failtrain)...... s1r4: 7RU

You has moar questions? Ask me directly!
Wren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:53 AM   #6
Cleatus
Now, where's my pitchfork?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 42
Cleatus has a spectacular aura aboutCleatus has a spectacular aura about
Default

It's really not that MTW is a bunch of cheaters. Almost every banning was of *one* player, who is now a member of TUS along with several of his accounts he somehow talked the MH into unbanning.
Cleatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:53 AM   #7
Thy
Selling silks, spices, and spam!
 
Thy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: My laptop....
Posts: 367
Thy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond reputeThy has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to Thy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wren View Post
and why, exactly, should allies be conquering each other?
to trade villages, to chief players that are deleting, etc. I've seen them done before on other servers.
__________________
Register for the new servers here

Wren's FAQ l Anti-farm Guide l Teuton Guide l Roman Guide l Gaul Guide l T's troop analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSZephyr View Post
Rep is like a medal, something to show off. It has no real significance but it's still nice to have.
Thy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:55 AM   #8
Wren
Information Coordinator
 
Wren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: So Chi you thought I was bashful
Posts: 6,537
Wren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond reputeWren has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Wren Send a message via Skype™ to Wren
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleatus View Post
It's really not that MTW is a bunch of cheaters. Almost every banning was of *one* player, who is now a member of TUS along with several of his accounts he somehow talked the MH into unbanning.
one guy accounted for 9 of the accounts in question. there were still a few more guilty parties.
__________________

s3r2: Deakon - Nemesis/WFTW (winnarz!!) ...... s6r2: Anon - CD (lulz, failtrain)...... s1r4: 7RU

You has moar questions? Ask me directly!
Wren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 06:55 AM   #9
SmackyBear
Pondering the perplexities of parentheses.
 
SmackyBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 698
SmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond reputeSmackyBear has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wren View Post
and why, exactly, should allies be conquering each other?
Geographical reasons. I don't want to derail the thread, but there are many situations where it is desirable. I haven't really seen it used on s3, but I've seen quite a few on s7.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted in The Big "Bad Idea" Thread
25. Limiting the number of attacks someone can make: Players will not be limited in the number of attacks they can send out per day, or the number of attacks they can send at a specific player in a given time period. This is a full-PVP war game; large numbers of fairly indiscriminant attacks are encouraged. If this bothers you, then there are plenty of similar games with more restrictions on attacking.
It was a bad idea then and it's a bad idea now.

"There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge."
-Bertrand Russell
SmackyBear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 07:07 AM   #10
Cleatus
Now, where's my pitchfork?
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 42
Cleatus has a spectacular aura aboutCleatus has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wren View Post
one guy accounted for 9 of the accounts in question. there were still a few more guilty parties.
10 actually. An additional 3 were other players punished for legitimate reasons but were only noobs making mistakes unintentionally. All others had apparently done nothing wrong, and were only banned because the above mentioned player had a grudge against MTW and reported half the alliance to MH with deliberately false information. Hence why few of the accounts that were in question other than his were banned for more than a very brief period of time or even got any sort of punishment.
Cleatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Go Back   Travian.us:: Forum > Embassies of Travian - World 3 > Politics & diplomacy - World 3
Reply




Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.